Given the uncertainty of the current context, our intention is to hold a hybrid conference (attendees may deliver their papers online or in person). If this hybrid model were not possible, we would then switch to a fully-online conference.

 

It has become almost mandatory to start any piece on cosmopolitanism with a reference to Diogenes the Cynic (412-323 BC) and his famous claim “I am a citizen of the world”. Alluring as the phrase may sound to our 21st century ears, when uttered by Diogenes, it was an invitation to be a social outsider: the allegiance to humanity as a whole implied becoming an exile from the comforts of one’s place of birth and social group (Nussbaum 1994). Two thousand years later, Immanuel Kant considered that the achievement of a cosmopolitan order was a must “if the human race was not to consume itself in wars between nations and if the power of nation-states was not to overwhelm the freedom of individual” (Fine and Cohen 2002). Kant’s ideals about a cosmopolitan world order, cosmopolitan law and cosmopolitan hospitality became the foundation on which moral cosmopolitanism, understood as a philosophical and political project aimed at the creation of cosmopolitan political institutions and the development of a cosmopolitan civil society, started to be theorised. This cosmopolitan tradition became especially appealing in the 1990s, a decade that witnessed the fall of the Berlin Wall and the end of apartheid, among other epochal changes, as well as the widespread use of the Internet and the emergence of the so-called network society. Cosmopolitanism became then a framework (or a “methodology” in Ulrich Beck’s words) to try to understand and deal with some of the challenges of globalization: the increased mobilities of people and goods, the proliferation of global risks, the redefinition of borders and the proliferation of global media and virtual communities, among others (Beck 2000).

The development of cinema in the late nineteenth century fed into cosmopolitan aspirations of modern city life and an increasing desire for travel. Films crossed national borders and opened up spaces for spectators’ mediated engagement with difference. The history of cinema abounds in examples of filmmakers that abandoned national contexts as their immediate frame of reference and created their work from and for a cosmopolitan imagination. Orson Welles, Jules Dassin, Ernst Lubitsch, Fritz Lang, Max Ophüls and, more recently, Michael Haneke, Alejandro González Iñárritu, Alfonso Cuarón and Yorgos Lanthimos immediately come to mind, but the list of travelling filmmakers, past and present, is much longer, and it includes names much more closely associated with a particular national or local identity, from Jean Renoir to Wong Kar-wai – not to mention, of course, travelling actors contributing to foster cosmopolitan aspirations, from Maurice Chevalier to Marion Cotillard and Charlotte Gainsbourg, from Louise Brooks to Marlene Dietrich, from Jean Seberg to Kristen Stewart, from Ingrid Bergman to Max von Sydow, from Jackie Chan to Maggie Cheung, from Dolores del Río to Penélope Cruz, from Sophia Loren to, yes, Clint Eastwood. The development of communication technologies since the 1980s has also led to the development of “globally dispersed productions.” Filmmakers, actors and technicians from all over the world form networks of international professionals collaborating beyond national differences. The outcome of these constant border-crossings have been innumerable films that have complicated national identities and showcased hybridity, and have explored the dynamic between the familiar and the stranger in a myriad ways. Similarly, from its inception, television brought other cultures and ways of seeing the world into the domestic space of one’s home. Digital television and multimedia platforms can now create cosmopolitan communities on demand. Audiovisual media have always played and are still playing a crucial role in the process that Beck refers to as the “cosmopolitanization” of the world. Yet, when compared to the existing literature on the issue in other areas, cosmopolitanism still remains a largely underexplored subject in film and television studies.

This conference will explore the ways in which cosmopolitan aspirations (and their enemies” in Ulrich Beck’s words) have made their way into English-speaking cinema and television across different time periods, nations, genres and media.

Areas to be explored include but are not limited to:

  • onscreen representations and constructions of cosmopolitan identities
  • the places of the cosmopolitan: borders, borderlands and global cities
  • the risk society: eco-cosmopolitanism
  • agents of cosmopolitanism onscreen: frequent travellers, tourists, migrants and refugees
  • cosmopolitanism and gender
  • cosmopolitan performances, performing cosmopolitanism
  • intimate encounters in a global context
  • visual and narrative articulations of the cosmopolitan
  • cosmopolitanism in film and television genres
  • cosmopolitan directors and stars. Celebrity cosmopolitanism
  • the limits and contradictions of onscreen cosmopolitanism
  • co-productions as cosmopolitan, global and/or transnational production strategies
  • cinematic and televisual representations of the global society
  • cosmopolitan film and television networks
  • globally-dispersed productions. Global industry, local labour
  • cosmopolitan communities and multimedia digital platforms
  • film and TV reception around the world: local, global and/or cosmopolitan audiences
  • cosmopolitanism and multilingual films, the politics of dubbing, subtitling and double versions

Submission:

Please submit a 300-500 word abstract and short bio (120 words) in English by April 9, 2021 to the conference website: http://eventos.unizar.es/43243/upload/cosmopolitan-aspirations-in-english-speaking-cinema-and-television.html

Scientific Committee:

María del Mar Azcona, Julia Echeverría, Pablo Gómez, Celestino Deleyto, David Roche, Nolwenn Mingant, Juan Suárez, Deborah Shaw.

Selected Bibliography

Anzaldúa, Gloria, 1999 (1987). Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.

Appiah, Kwame Anthony, 2006. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York: W. W. Norton.

Atkinson, Paul and Rebecca Strating. 2016. “Cosmopolitanism on Demand? Television and the Narrowing of Mediated Social Connection.” In P. David Marshall et al., eds. Contemporary Publics: Shifting Boundaries in New Media,

Technology and Culture. London: Palgrave MacMillan. 129-144. Beck, Ulrich, 2009. World at Risk. Translated by Cieran Cronin. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.

Beck, Ulrich, “The Cosmopolitan Perspective: Sociology of the Second Age of Modernity.” British Journal of Sociology 51: 79-105.

Brown, Garrett Wallace and David Held, eds. 2010. The Cosmopolitanism Reader. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press. 17–26.

Calhoun, Craig, 2002. “The Class Consciousness of Frequent Travelers: Toward a Critique of Actually Existing Cosmopolitanism”. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 101: 4, 869–897, 871.

Cooper, Anthony and Rumford, Chris, 2011. “Cosmopolitan Borders: Bordering as Connectivity.” In Rovisco, Maria and Magdalena Nowicka, eds. 261–276.

Delanty, Gerard, ed. 2012. Routledge Handbook of Cosmopolitan Studies. London and New York: Routledge. 245-253.

Deleyto, Celestino, 2017. “Looking from the Border: A Cosmopolitan Approach to Contemporary Cinema.” Transnational Cinemas, 8:2, 95-112.

Glick Schiller, Nina and Andrew Irving, eds. 2017. Whose Cosmopolitanism? Critical Perspectives, Relationalities and Discontents. New York & Oxford: Berghahn, 160-174.

Littler, Jo, 2008. “I feel your pain”: Cosmopolitan Charity and the Public Fashioning of the Celebrity Soul’. Social Semiotics, 18:2, 237-251, 239.

Nussbaum, Martha C., 1994. “Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism”. Boston Review, October 1. http://www.bostonreview.net/martha-nussbaum-patriotismand- cosmopolitanism.

Nussbaum, Martha C., 2008. “Toward a Globally Sensitive Patriotism”, Daedalus, 137 (3), 78–93.

Rovisco, María and Nowicka, Magdalena, eds. 2011. The Ashgate Research Companion to Cosmopolitanism. Farnham: Ashgate. p. 1

Rumford, Chris, 2008. Cosmopolitan Spaces: Europe, Globalization, Theory. London: Routledge.

Sassen, Saskia, 1998. Globalization and Its Discontents: Essays on the New Mobility of People and Money. New York: The New York Press.

Schwartz, Vanessa R., 2007. “It’s so French”: Hollywood, Paris and the Making of Cosmopolitan Film Culture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Sennett, Richard, 2002. “Cosmopolitanism and the Social Experience of Cities.” In Vertovec, Steven and Cohen, Robin, eds. 42-47.

Skrbis, Zlatko and Ian Woodward, 2013. Cosmopolitanism: Uses of the Idea. Los Angeles, London: Sage. p. 82.

Vertovec, Steven and Robin Cohen, eds. 2002. Conceiving Cosmopolitanism: Theory, Context and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.